Thursday, June 10, 2010

5 THINGS WE'VE GOT WRONG ABOUT AGENTS Part 1

I just read an enlightening piece by agent Jennifer Lawler in a June 1 Writers Digest post busting some wide-spread myths about agents. A real eye opener.

She says SILENCE DOES NOT MEAN NO, so it’s OK to follow up on a query or resubmit if you’ve heard nothing, because email evaporates so often.

And—most important to me at the moment—she explains why we’re getting those form rejections on partials and fulls.

She says, “If I believe a book could be improved by revision, I’ll make suggestions and ask the writer to resubmit, or I’ll offer representation conditional on certain revisions being made.”

Otherwise, she says, “I don’t think I have any business telling you where I think you’ve gone wrong.” Because “what I think is wrong with your novel may be what the next agent thinks is right with it.”

Yesterday I got a rejection on a full from an agent I had a lot of hope for. She gave a few reasons for her rejection—that the heroine and hero don’t fit traditional roles for romantic comedy. I spent the night wondering if I should revise, but after reading Ms. Lawler’s article, I’m not sure I will. At least I’ll wait to see if I get similar feedback elsewhere.

13 comments:

  1. But I'm so SICK of "traditional roles" for romantic comedy. Isn't everyone?
    *sigh*
    Good luck, that's all I have to say.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it's admirable to have heroes/heroines that aren't 'traditional'!!

    Thanks for your comment and for excellent advice too

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's great information to share. Thanks. I think it's good to wait until you see if more than one person gives the same feedback. We all have personal likes and dislikes that may color our opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The problem with SILENCE DOES NOT MEAN NO is what if it really does and you resubmit and get another no, or the dreaded silence. You're still no further ahead of the game and probably have pissed off the agent to boot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. PW, I'm as confused as you by some of this stuff. I think we have to be very careful to comb the agent's website and see if they have any "Don't ever darken our doors again if you don't hear from us" caveats before re-submitting. I wish they'd get together and have a uniform set of rules.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great post. I'm glad you decided to keep it as it is. I personally believe that AT LEAST three people have to say the same comment in order for it to really count. One person's minus may be someone else's divine nirvana.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Everything is just too subjective now. I'm soooo tired of that word.

    .........dhole

    ReplyDelete
  8. *hug*

    Sorry about hearing you got a pass on that full. I can sympathize. Even though I'm so new to this submitting thing I have felt that pain and I am in the same boat as you are with my romantic comedies (two manuscripts)though I didn't get specific feedback on my book itself only on my writing overall (and it was kind feedback) Still it was a no :(

    I bet your book is awesome. You post and tweet such wonderful informative stuff, thank you so much. Your blog is one I really, really appreciate.

    Wishing for a world where more non-traditional heroes and heroines populate original romantic comedies...

    bru

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oh! I forgot-

    You said:"PW, I'm as confused as you by some of this stuff. I think we have to be very careful to comb the agent's website and see if they have any "Don't ever darken our doors again if you don't hear from us" caveats before re-submitting. I wish they'd get together and have a uniform set of rules."

    I blogged recently on just this- "How standard is standard" and I totally agree- a general industry consensus would be beyond wonderful...I'm gearing up for another round of contradiction comparison because if I don't laugh about it I might well cry and I hate that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks everybody. You've all got wise things to say. I guess I'm over it now. I took the agent's eagerness to be enthusiasm for my writing, but it's an eagerness for my "high concept," which I'm not dealing with in a predictable way.

    February, I've got to check out your blog. I've been thinking of blogging about those contradictory rules myownself. They're crazymaking.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey, Anne, I'm a new follower, but I could already see that you're a very talented writer by reading some posts on your blog.

    I hate the typical hero/heroine MC in romantic comedies; I believe the reader's want something that is "out of the box," not something that is generic and common.

    Write on, Anne!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks Vatche. I appreciate your comments.

    I fear my work breaks one of the cardinal rules of publishing: never invent your own genre. Unfortunately, I sort of did with my first two books. I write "bad boyfriend" comedies. The woman ends up alone but stronger and standing on her own two feet. A happy ending for an overpopulated planet.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.